Community Living | Coupon | Police Scanner | E-News Signup | Archives | Merchant Directory | Dining Guide
Have a HOT TIP? Call 704-276-6587 Or E-mail us At
Advanced Search
Lincoln Herald | Lincolnton, NC

home : opinion : opinion January 17, 2020

1/4/2020 4:09:00 PM
Proposed Resolution: A Pointless Political Show

Wayne Howard
Staff Writer

The squabble over proposed gun control legislation in Virginia has become one of the most talked-about subjects on social media--and as usual, much of what you read there isn't true.

Now, the wild discussion has spread to other states including North Carolina. Several Virginia counties passed what are called "Second Amendment Sanctuary" resolutions. A few North Carolina counties have passed similar resolutions--although the meaning and intent may differ somewhat from those in Virginia--and now Lincoln County Commissioners will consider (and no doubt pass unanimously) such a resolution at their meeting Monday night (Jan. 6th).

I'm sure many will express their anger about it, but I think it's not only right, it's our duty, to report what is really true (and tell what is not); so here it is, and if it upsets you, well Scarlett...

First, the resolution Lincoln County Commissioners will pass can be read at

There's nothing wrong with the resolution, as I told one Commissioner when he informed me about what they were going to do, but as I told him, it's largely a political statement and totally useless. Why? The Constitution of the US is the law--the supreme law of the country--and it is the law whether or not any state or county chooses to agree or disagree. The 'gun rights' folks will no doubt like the resolution, but it's no more significant than a resolution declaring that the County favors other Constitutional amendments and that it will not use 'public funds, resources, employees, buildings or offices' to restrict any other Constitutional right.

Second, as already mentioned, the intent of the local resolution is somewhat different from the intent of "Second Amendment Sanctuary" resolutions passed by several Virginia counties.

For anyone who doesn't already know, the Democrats are about to take over control of both houses of the Virginia legislature, and the state has a Democratic governor. That shift in power is creating an opportunity for those favoring stronger gun control laws to pass them. Whether or not they can withstand a Constitutional test is yet to be decided; whether or not they'll be enforced is also still at question.

By way of background, current Virginia laws do not require a permit to purchase rifles, shotguns or handguns, do not require firearm registration or licensing, do not require any kind of permit to carry a rifle or shotgun.

Current laws also don't regulate the transfer or possession of higher-powered (.50-caliber) rifles or large capacity ammunition magazines. Virginia state law doesn't require any background check before transferring a firearm between individuals, imposes no waiting period before the sale of a firearm, doesn't require owners to report lost or stolen guns. Concealed carry does require a court-issued permit and gun dealers must contact state police for a background check before they make a sale.

There are some restrictions on so-called assault firearms, currently defined as being designed to accommodate a silencer or folding stock, and having a magazine that can hold over 20 rounds. Non-US citizens can’t buy, possess or transport one; and so-called "streetsweepers" (semi-automatic shotguns) are banned.

The proposed new laws would ban assault weapons, silencers and high-capacity magazines  (more than 10 rounds for rifles, more than seven for shotguns), require universal background checks on all firearm transactions, limit the purchase of handguns to no more than one per month, allow local governments like counties, cities & towns to pass local ordinances banning firearms from libraries and other government buildings, require that all thefts of firearms be reported to police within 24 hours after the gun or guns went missing, prohibit possession of guns by a person under a court-issued protective order.

Another proposal would more severely punish adults who allow access of a loaded, “unsecured” firearm to someone 18 or younger. Another, details of which are still sketchy, would address "ghost guns," guns made from parts and therefore technically not yet weapons and therefore not covered by the existing or other proposed legislation.

The proposed legislation has set up the possibility of open defiance. The Virginia Citizens Defense League, a pro-gun lobby, said on its website that “law enforcement officers do not have to, and shouldn’t, enforce any unconstitutional laws.”

Over 100 counties, towns and cities in Virginia have adopted "Second Amendment Sanctuary" resolutions, vowing not to enforce any “unconstitutional” gun laws. It's a bit like (although on a different subject) the few North Carolina sheriffs who have decided not to cooperate with ICE (Immigration & Customs Enforcement) because they say they don't have to enforce federal laws.

The resolution Lincoln Commissioners will pass is not intended to shift the decision over what laws are or are not Constitutional to the local level. Sheriff Beam in taking his oath of office vowed to enforce state laws that do not contradict US law. The decision over what is and what is not Constitutional is not his--nor the Commissioners'--it is a matter that if needed would be decided by the courts.

The proposed Virginia law changes aren't yet finalized--there were some proposals submitted last year when the Republicans still held control in the legislature; but the proposals don't include a lot of what some are claiming (without substantial evidence) that they do. There is no proposal to do away with bows & arrows--there are already existing laws that restrict their use where they might cause danger to the public, local ordinances that prohibit them being used in highly populated areas and such. While it wasn't a part of the original bills as introduced, a 'grandfather clause' would protect those who already own some guns that would be illegal under the new proposals.

As said, the Lincoln County Commissioners will almost certainly pass the resolution--and there's nothing wrong with it based on its wording. It is, however, pointless from a legal standpoint--since it says only that they'll comply with the Constitution, and they really don't have any other choice. It is, however, 'good politics' in this county and will no doubt be applauded. It makes about as much sense as a resolution saying we like apple pie. What's wrong with that?

4 - Dona R. Berry - Brow Gal

One big editorial difference between the Lincoln Herald and area newspapers is that rather than share opinions published by other newspapers across the state or around the country, we are never shy about expressing our opinions.  We also welcome the opinions of our readers from our service area (Lincoln, Catawba, Gaston and Cleveland counties) and gladly publish letters to the editor and guest columns on current issues.  We consider it an important part of providing the best local coverage to our readers. Your comments or opposing viewpoints are always welcome.  We do insist that you identify yourself--we didn't claim anonymity, and neither should others expressing their views.  Email all letters to the editor to

If you haven’t already: join the over 12,000 who have 'l
iked' our Facebook page  at , follow us on Twitter  @LincolnHerald20, and sign up for our FREE daily email service.


1 - Erie Insurance 500

Reader Comments

Posted: Monday, January 6, 2020
Article comment by: Greg Davis

So how can States set up Sanctuary Cities and Counties to protect Illegal Aliens? There is nothing in the Constitution protecting Illegal Aliens. And ,yes, they are illegal if they crossed our borders without approval and proper paperwork from our Government, because they have broken US Immigration laws. Explain how one is applauded by Liberals and the other is not.

Posted: Sunday, January 5, 2020
Article comment by: Brian Swift

This article is a prime example of why concerned citizens are taking actions such as this. The liberal media cannot force all of their agenda on the American people at once so they whittle away at our freedoms, religion, and rights in small bites until they have achieved their goals. It will be interesting to see if this will make print since I dont agree with the writer. People who disagree with articles like this have little freedom of speech these days.... think about that.......let that sink in!

Posted: Sunday, January 5, 2020
Article comment by: Angie France

It's very insulting with your Scarlett reference. Why can't you just state your opinion without trying to make yourself so superior? You act as though you are the only one that is right.

Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

HomeNewsState NewsReligionOpinionSportsObituariesExtrasCommunityClassifiedsSubmitLife

Terms and Use | Merchant Directory | Dining Guide
Site Design and Content
Copyright Lincoln Herald, LLC 2011-2019


Software © 1998-2020 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved